Testing, one, two, three. Good morning, everyone. Glad you all are here on this wonderful Saturday morning. I know you're enjoying the fellowship, but the people at home in the living room are saying start, start. So we got to get going here and glad all of you are here. Why don't we been talking about power. Why don't we sing about power a little bit? There's power in the blood. Hymn number 225. Once you find that in your hymnal, open it up and then stand up. Hymn number 225 is what we're going to sing here. How about right almost right now? And we'll begin 225. You join me, sing loud for those online. Here we go on the first verse. Would you be free from the burden of sin? There's power in the blood, power in the blood. Would you or evil a victory wind? There's wonderful power in the blood. There is power. There is power, working power. And that's the best kind of power there is right there, isn't it? In the precious blood of the Lamb. Let's have a word of prayer. Heavenly Father, thank you for this day. As we gather here. We just pray that the insights and encouragement we get again from the word of God and from studying the world around us so that we can understand the things of God even more. Would all come together to give us just great enlightenment this morning for our world. For the betterment of not only our lives. But the world around us and especially our children and our grandchildren. Those who come after us. We pray in Jesus name. Amen. And you ladies and gentlemen may be seated. So glad that each one of you are here today on a Saturday morning. We had a lot of our local church people who are out of town or have already left for the season. So I think this is a pretty good Saturday morning turnout and appreciate that and you being here and coming for that. There is a handout this morning. It's available for those of you online at worship. I the RWM connect site. And for those of you not online, if you're right here, it's available back there on the table and there's actually two handouts. We'll have a session three and a session four this morning, session one and two being last night. And we are in a moment going to talk about environmental tyranny and its agenda. Now let's back up and review just a little bit last night because you slept and gained some more energy, didn't you? For today and our premise of the whole study, everything rises and falls on the premise or the assumption. Our premise is that in the beginning, god made matter very quickly. He hovered over it, fluttered over it, moved on it and energized it. And then he set light to keep that motion going so that he is not necessarily moving, energizing it today. He energized it all at the beginning, and it is energized. And we mentioned just a little briefly last night, the law of conservation. I don't remember who came up with that. Was that Newton or Einstein or somebody smart that basically said energy is you never lose energy. You transfer energy, but you can't lose energy. And certainly electrons, the electrons that are going through these lights right now, they are going to go on, be used for something else. Some of them will end up in other light bulbs. Some of them will end up you don't spend an electron to where it's not in existence anymore. It just carries on to the next thing that it will get caught up in. It might go and rust a nail or something unless it's been galvanized. So these electrons that God created from the beginning in our premise, they're still here. They're still with us. As a matter of fact, maybe it gets into some vitamin C and you take it and you fight off a virus or a disease or something that's within you, and it does all that work. Now, all of that basically, again, this is too broad of a definition, I suppose. But basically I'm saying if it's an electron, let's call it electricity. It's at least potential electricity. And it's the same stuff that electricity is made out of, because electricity doesn't have anything other than electrons. You just get them moving all in the right direction and at the strength and power. You need that's electricity. So we live in an electric world. All of the universe around us and everything that we've got has been electrified by God. He made it that way, and then he gave us dominion over it, and he made us in his image. And we know his image by looking at the things of this Earth. And that carries over and says, okay, I must be electrified. Well, all of this then you could take all of that without knowing any science and get from the Bible. We must have a lot of power embedded within the foundational elements of this world. And then you would go out and you would begin to do some study as people did through the years. And by the way, it was Christians that fueled the thought of science in the early days especially. They went out and studied it and said, well, sure enough, you got atoms, and atoms got protons and neutrons and electrons. And if you can get all those electrons kind of cooperating with one another, you can send it to a frog leg and make a frog leg jump and do all sorts of exciting things with this. And they begin to put it all together. So I think that what we've done. I'm sure there are several of you here, many online and others that know a lot more about electricity than I do, whether it's on a practical level of red to red and black to black or it's on an electromechanical level or electromagnetism level or electrical engineering level. You could talk circles around me and lose me real quick on all of that. But I think one of the problems that we have had is that we have separated electricity from the Bible. We've made those two separate things. You go down to the engineering school to learn the things about electricity or to the VoTech school to learn things about how to hook up electricity and whatnot, but we've not connected that to the Bible and God creating the electricity. We almost want to say Benjamin Franklin invented electricity, and we've been using it ever since. Thomas Edison turned it into a light bulb and Alexander Grand Bell made it into a telephone, and we've been cursed ever since. So we make electricity as if it's some modern invention onto mankind. Actually, if you study the history of electricity, you will find that people were using electricity back thousands of years ago, not necessarily in the same ways we were, but they understood that electricity was there, and they had studied enough on how to garner some of it and how to use some of it and make all that work. So my premise last night is let's bring these two together. Let's say that the electrical forces of this world are God given, God made, and even hinted at least enough in the Bible that if you are a scientist, just going from the first five verses of Genesis, chapter one, you would say, I want to figure this electrical generation thing out. What is that? So that was the premise last night. And then, of course, the premise that if every atom is electrified, then our bodies must be as well. And we looked at that and how to use that to our advantage with oxidation and reduction and all that kind of stuff. Are you ready for the test on that? Okay, good. So that was the premise. Two problems before we get into the new material today, but two comments I want to give one I've already given. One is the problem is we separated power from theology or from the Bible. I think we should put that together. That's number one. But the second thing is the New Age people didn't the New Age people kept power, electricity and their theology, not Bible, but their theology together. So when we hear things like, you're an electrical being and you need to get charged up and it sounds New Age to us, it's not New Age. The New Age just took that, which really is, I think, a physical idea made by our spiritual God, and they went off and ran with it and did some weird things to it and whatnot. But I don't think we have to assign electrical movement within us as New Age. I think it's one of those things that we would say. Let me give an example. I obviously think that Mormon theology is heretical but Mormon theology believes there's a Father and a Son and the Holy Spirit. So we should never talk about there being a Father and the Son and Holy Spirit because that's Mormon. Well, no. They believe the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. We believe in the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. We talk about it in the proper way, they talk about it in the wrong way. Same thing with the new age that picks up on some new age again is going to talk about crystals and all this kind of thing. Why? Well, because honestly, crystals are pretty highly charged electrically and they've come to understand some of these things scientifically and they've made that a religious aspect. And I think that in a more proper way we can take that back and we can use that. I had a friend, in fact, I was just chatting with him a little bit this morning. He asked how things went last night and I said Fine. Why weren't you listening? And he said, Well, I actually just started I'm starting with session one right now. I said, well, you'll be a hippie by noon. Now, can you believe that there is electrical charge and that we should take advantage of that without being new age? I think you can. I think obviously in fact, I think you'll be a healthier person if you do this and connect that now with this. We're going to move on. Let me tell you where we're moving on. The foundation is we have an electrical everything. Then we said we have an electrical body. Now we're going to look at those who look at God and the world differently and the way they use that. Then to bring about what I'm calling what am I calling it? Environmental tyranny and its agenda. Well, let's start with the scripture here. I'll tell you what, we'll do that. Let's go to Genesis, chapter eight today, verse 22 and Genesis 822. Does anybody remember the context of Genesis eight? I think somebody said it Noah, the flood. Six, seven and eight. So we're in the midst of the flood here and by 822 he's just coming off the flood and coming off the ark and the Lord is speaking to him and he says Genesis 822 while the earth remains, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night shall not cease. Now I think that is a pretty phenomenal promise, isn't it? That the things that we depend upon and more than anything we depend upon seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night. We need these to keep going. Even in Southern California where you don't have summer and winter or in New York City where you don't have day or night, even in those places you need that to happen somewhere else or you're going to be in big, big trouble. So here is, I think this fundamental promise in Genesis 822. It's a fundamental promise to all of creation. In fact, if you were to read the broader context, god is saying, I'm not going to flood the Earth anymore. Here's a bow that I'll give as a part of the covenant. And we take the covenant that God gave with now and the rainbow and whatnot. We take it, of course, to be a promise that God was not going to flood the Earth. But even a bigger part of the promise is while the Earth remaineth, yes, it's still here. Seed time and harvest, cold, heat, summer, winter, day, night shall not cease. Now, we who are Christians can take that as a fundamental promise to creation. When you take the Bible and know the Bible and believe the Bible, you are freed from so many kinds of worries, aren't you? And this is one of the worries that I think that we can be freed from. Remember, the Y two K thing turned out to be a whole lot of nothing, but even in the midst of Y two K, we were thinking, none of the computers are going to work, nothing's going to work. And even then I didn't know much about it. But I was thinking, well, surely wheat will still grown it. I mean, cows will eat grass regardless of whether they got the computer program or not. I don't think it's really going to be totally the end of the world. We'll be able to have seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night. Those things aren't based upon whether or not your computer can figure out what year it is, right? But the world really was in a frenzy over all of that. Now, was there a reason to worry or not reason to worry? I don't know. Well, I do know and looking back on it 22 years later, there wasn't any reason to worry. But nonetheless, the world was in the frenzy about it. The world gets in a lot of frenzy and we can get caught up in that. And let me say that one of the biggest oxidizers of your cells that you have is stress. Stress will oxidize the cells, and oxidized cells mean you're sick. And you keep that up and you are going to end up with some sort of chronic illness or some sort of short term illness, whatever stress will make you sick. You can worry yourself sick, right? We all have, and stress will do that. Now, if we just take the Bible, we're Christians and say, okay, I'm going to worry about the things the Bible tells me to worry about and not anything else. I can tell you that. The Bible tells you, don't worry about the issue of whether or not there's going to be seed time and harvest. There will be obviously there's going to be good years and bad years and the seed time and the harvest. Don't worry about whether there's going to be cold and heat, don't worry about the weather, is going to be summer and winter, day and night. These are things that are built in. Now, if I could add to this just a little bit, may I? God add one more thing. I think we could say the whole issue with electrons being foundational to every atom that exists, that one's not going away. As long as Earth exists, that's not going away. And the reason is, if that goes away, earth doesn't exist anymore and we won't have to worry about it, right? So sea, diamond harvest, cold, heat, summer, winter, day, night. And electrons and protons and neutrons are not going to pass away. They're not going to cease. Now, that really frees us again from a lot of worry. And have you noticed that there are people out there who like to use fear as a motivator? And fear is a pretty good motivator, isn't it? Maybe fear is the greatest motivator there is and so they like to use fear as a motivator. But if you and I come down with some basic principles that come from the Bible, we have no need to fear. Now, I think that Genesis 822 is very clear. You noticed that I didn't have to talk about the parsing of the verbs and what Hebrew word what this means. It's just so simple that whatever language you're reading in, you can figure out what God was saying here is that I'm going to keep this world going. And you might have a lot of other things to worry about, but you don't need to worry about whether or not the world is going to work. It is going to work. So it is so clear and can give such encouraging counsel and encouragement to every Bible believing citizen on Earth. Now, again, as I already said, if you add genesis one through five and add the atoms and the electrons and the protons there, then we can know that we live in a world that is energized at its very core. That's the world we live in. So let me just ask you a plain, simple pretest. Is the world ever going to run out of energy? No, it runs out of energy. It blew up, it's disintegrated, it quit working. The world will never run out of energy because it's at its very core. But the creative world is not going to run out of energy. But the human world has often, and I would say for the most part, has rejected the Bible and therefore human thinking, human philosophy does not agree with Genesis 822. Have you ever been taught that it's going to freeze? I mean, the world is going to burn up, the climate is changing. I mean, we're going to all drown. I mean, we're all going to not have water. They've been put out there. You remember the what was it, the Weekly Reader back in the 70s? Some of you all of my age, right? You get the Weekly Reader. And I can still remember how frightening those articles were telling us about how by the time we were in the 10th grade, new Mexico would be beach land. And yet none of it came to pass. It doesn't really matter in education if it's actually true, because public education is always designed to be an experiment. Let's try this out for a little while, see if that works. No, that didn't work. Let's go to a different plan and move onto something else. So we come and we have this fundamental promise, but the world has rejected this fundamental promise because the world has rejected God and everything that God has revealed. We live in a world that has rejected the Bible. And with that, I'll just make it down to you. If you reject one philosophy, you will accept another philosophy. You have to have a philosophy about something, and so you decide to reject this one. Okay, well, the complimentary one or the competing one is this philosophy over here. So I didn't do that philosophy. I will do this philosophy. And you take that well. The world is the same way. If the world rejects the Bible and the economic picture, environmental picture, that the Bible gives, what our environment is and how it's made, if the world rejects that, well, what happens? They will accept something else. And what is that philosophy that they are going to accept? Now, you and I really are in a minority of those who have just said, if the Bible says it, I believe it. That's good. I'm going with it. And so here's our philosophy. But that's not the one that the world has. As a matter of fact, the world has largely, I would say, accepted some form of Darwinianism. We're talking about Charles Darwin and the evolution of the species was his book. Though evolutionary theology, let's call it, though evolutionary theology has changed some and is changing over the years. Nonetheless, that is the philosophy that the world has developed. You go into public school, that's the philosophy they have. You turn on the Discovery Channel, that's the philosophy they have. Where you look at the History Channel, that's the philosophy they have. You turn on the news, that's the philosophy that they have. That we invite you, you watch and of course, over the last few months, I've been watching a lot of science videos. You watch science videos, and you have to pick and choose because they might get some things right about electrons and how all that works. And even the human body. We were talking last night about the neurons and the amazing way the neurons turn things off and on. And I didn't get into it, but literally, there are thousands of neurons in your body, all of these various channels saying, off, on, off, on, off, on. And they're working through that. And if you watch a video on that likely it's going to say something about this is the way we evolved. It's amazing how over billions and billions of years we evolved this way. So the Darwinian concept is that which has been accepted by the public, the general public that is out there. Now, of course, you know that they adopted this without one shred of evidence other than Charles Darwin said, here's a good idea. And everybody said, yeah, that's a good idea. I think the reason the world jumped on it so strongly is because the world was looking for a way to reject God anyway. And Darwin's idea certainly is Godless. And so, hey, we don't need a God. We didn't want one in the first place. Been looking to figure out how to get rid of him, but I couldn't figure out how we got here. Now, Darwin brings this idea, I'll take it, I'll go with his idea there. Now, you remember that one of the fundamentals of Darwinian theology is the survival of the fittest. The survival of the fittest. Every one of you knew it and you all rejected Darwinianism, right? I mean, everybody knows survival of the fittest. Now what happens when general society accepts this theology that the way we got here was the survival of the fittest? I'll tell you what happens. You begin to fight to make sure you're the fittest. I've got to survive. I'm going to make sure that if everybody else goes, I'm still going to be here. And that gets ingrained into you by this idea of the survival of the fittest. And with that creed of the survival of the fittest among humanity, let's just talk about humanity here. We can guarantee if society adopts and it has the idea of survival of the fittest, somebody is going to die. Because in that idea is there's probably not room here for both of us, there's probably not resources for both of us. And I'm planning to figure out how I can get rid of you. Now, we probably don't do that on a neighborly basis. Sometimes husband's wives do, but for the most part we're all kind of nice to our neighbors and whatnot. But you get to the scientific realm or you get to the governmental realm, especially the global governmental realm, and it really does become we've got too many people here and what are we going to do to get rid of them so that we can survive? And so somebody is definitely going to die. Adolf Hitler adopted Darwinian theology and he decided, I got some competition. What needs to happen to them? Survival of the fittest. They need to die. That people group needs to die. Communism adopted this. And so whether it was Stalin or in the USSR or Mao in China or whatever it is, somebody's got to die. This is a survival of the fittest kind of theology that goes and then along with that Darwinian theology, there has been by and large, this is not totally true, but by and large in our society there's been an acceptance of a second theology and that is this Mother Earth theology that really turns everything up on its head. And rather than a biblical philosophy that says you and I have dominion over this earth, all the things that were created, god made it, he energized it, he gave it to us, he said it's yours, and go do good things with it. Well, the world has rejected that idea. It does not believe that we have dominion. It believes that we are subservient to nature, to Mother Earth. And it's really, sometimes on a practical level, sometimes on a stated level, has made earth the Goddess. And there is a worship of the earth rather than the earth being used as a tool for us under our ownership. And so what has happened again, all this, the world has been turned upside down. And what has happened then is the lowest has become subservient to the highest other way around. The highest has become subservient to the lowest. We are the highest, the pinnacle of God's creation. We have dominion now, all of that from Genesis 822, which is no longer up there, but from Genesis 822 and from this electric world that we live in and our electric beings and our being in charge of all this, to use it for our good pleasure and for good things, all of that has been rejected by the world. They have accepted a Darwinian and a Mother Earth theology. And that then brings us to environmental tyranny. What is environmental tyranny? It usually goes by the name or the term. What you've probably heard is green agenda. And the green agenda is pretty powerful today, isn't it? And pretty popular today and maybe among us and our neighbors. Let me say first of all, I think as well, how many of you try to do basic upkeep on your home? Yeah, okay, so you're a good steward. You try to sweep the walk every now and then, you try to fix the leak. Sometimes you do some basic things, not because you have a green agenda, but because you're just a good steward. Again, good stewardship we're all for, but we can be a good steward and not adopt the green agenda. The green agenda, the Green New Deal, whatever you want to call it. All these things that go together is often associated with some of the terms like climate change or sustainable development. You perhaps heard that one. Or carbon footprint, perhaps you've heard that one. Or net zero, perhaps you've heard that one. These are all terms that come with this Darwinian Mother Earth kind of theology that is out there that they would like to put upon us. And the environmental agenda of the tyranny that comes about here. And I'll show you in a moment why it's tyranny. But the environmental agenda of the tyranny really comes and says, we don't have an electric world. We have a very limited supply and we're going to really have to watch out. In fact, I think your electricity is going to have to be turned down. Lower your electricity. You're going to have to cut down on your gasoline. You're going to have to not do this. And we'll see again some of that how that becomes tyranny in all of this. Now, let me say that the Green agenda is not at all based upon science. As a matter of fact, I think you all would agree with me that science is hard to come by anymore. Science is given out to the highest bidder. What do you need the report to say? I'll be happy to develop that report in order that it will say what you need it to say. While I'm thinking about it, let me chase a rabbit. Can I? Everybody but Louis said yes. This is pastoral tyranny. I'm going to do it anyway. I mentioned vitamin C a couple of times. Let's take vitamin C. If you decide, hey, I want to use some vitamin C because it gives electrons. Instead of taking mine, it gives it it sounds like a good thing. I want to do that. So you go on the Internet, is vitamin C good for my health? No studies have ever been done that proved that vitamin C is good for your health. Okay, I guess what I heard is just kind of all big hook. No studies have ever been done. Let me tell you why no studies have ever been done. There's no way it would ever be economically viable. You get vitamin C cheap. Nobody owns a patent on vitamin C. Nobody can really go out and sell vitamin C to do a double blind study, medical study on vitamin C or zinc or you pick whatever you want out there to do a double blind study. Literally, you're going to spend millions and millions of dollars to make it happen over 1020 years to make it happen. And so they use that. No study has ever been done to say, see there? We don't even know if this stuff works. The truth is, study has been done for about 2000 years by people using it and nobody can make any money. So obviously, if I was doing medical research, I wouldn't put my millions of dollars into a vitamin C study either, because I would never make my money out and back. It would just be money down the drain. So don't take that fallacy that well. I want to make sure there's a scientific report on it. Scientific reports are given, especially that which is given on a peer reviewed level. Scientific reports are given to help somebody or some company to make money, and somebody's got to pay the bill. And the person that's going to pay the bill is the person that's going to get the report that mostly will say, What they needed to say because they're designing the study. How about that? Here's the flip side fallacy when it comes to scripture again I use the King James and so we don't run across this. But if you take I don't know in your new American Standard Bible and you come to a lot of footnotes in the new American Standard Bible will say the oldest text say, the oldest text say oh well I guess my King James is wrong because the older text say we've already talked about it a few weeks ago. Guess what? The only reason they're older is because they were written in the desert and they didn't rot away like the ones up there in the rainy country. That's a reason. So we take these things there's no study. This can't be good. The older texts say they've got to be the ones we go with. We can't go with those new ones and there's all these fallacies that are put out and they're just repeated again over and over and over. Now the environmental agenda, environmental tyranny is not science based. It is really a political fundraising movement and a power movement. How can we raise money and you can raise gajillions of dollars with the Green agenda and you can empower yourself or your movement within all of that. And like all tyrannical movements it is based upon how do you manipulate the masses. And they're doing a pretty good job of manipulating the masses, aren't they? But at its ground is we reject Genesis 822. Seed time and harvest is not always going to remain. Summer and winter are not always going to remain. The Bible is wrong. God doesn't know what he's talking about. In fact there is no God. There's a very limited supply of energy in this world and we have to capture it for the rich and the powerful and let the rest eat cake as they die in the cold and in the dark. That's the green agenda. Now I'm not going to present it in a very pretty way today and not necessarily even care if it hurts AOC's feelings. Now let's talk about what this agenda is, the deadly agenda of the environmental tyranny. The tyranny has adopted policies that are destructive to civilization. The Green agenda either has adopted or is pushing the adoption of policies that literally make it impossible for us to live our lives like we have been living our lives. In fact they make it impossible for the most part for life even to be lived for the 5 billion people or whatever it is that live on the face of this earth. Those policies will not sustain the population today and yet that is what they have done. The Green agenda really does sentence. And those of you by the way, if you happen to kind of be favorable to the Green Agenda or maybe think well I think we do need to make some changes, listen through to this because what we've got is basically a wholesale slaughter of individuals. Which ones? Who's going to die with the Green Agenda? I'll tell you who it is. It's going to be the poor. As a matter of fact, the Green Agenda sentences billions of people into poverty. And what does poverty do to health? Straight down, poor people have more health problems than rich people. You put them into poverty, guess what they're going to have? They're going to have health problems and they're going to have mental problems. And all the things that come with poverty and the Green Agenda says, I don't care. Let billions of people be poor. I need to be well cared for. Survival of the fittest is the idea that goes. The policies of the Green Agenda are anti poor and anti middle class. Most of us fit right there. We're poor or middle class, right? I'm poor, you're middle class. That's the way it always works. So the policies really are against us. The tyranny is against us, and the poor in the middle class are those who are going to pay for it and bear the burden of the Green new Agenda. Now, again, remember what did John Wesley say as he introduced himself in his electricity book here? He said, what electricity made in plain and simple by a lover of mankind and common sense? Shouldn't we be a lover of mankind and of common sense? We should. If you're a lover of mankind, we'll just drop even the common sense right here. But if you are a lover of mankind, you are going to be against policies that are going to sentence billions of people into poverty and into sickness and cause them to pay the bills for what you're doing. That is a grotesquely anti human kind of agenda that goes along now, because poor people, again are going to be going to be the first people to die. They're going to be the first people to starve. They're going to be the first people to get sick. They're going to be the first people to experience housing shortages. Have you noticed that today? It's not just House New Mexico that has a housing shortage, is it? It's everywhere you go has a housing shortage. Why? Because the chickens come home to roost, so to speak. The environmental agenda that has made it and will make it worse, made it where? You can't afford some lumber, you can't afford some concrete, you can't afford the government red tape, you can't afford the land you can't afford on and on and on it goes. And then there's no place for the poor people to live. And so what happens? They end up sick, dying, frozen out there on the streets. And it's the environmental agenda that brings all of this about. It's the poor people who are going to suffer from food shortages more than the rich people. You know, I'll flip it around. I'm rich. I got a freezer and I got a deep freeze, and I got stuff in there that I don't even know what's in there, right? Most of you are the same way. Like, what in the world is at the bottom down there? Except Scott, who keeps an inventory. It's one of those weirdos everywhere. The rest of us are like, I don't know what's down there when it got there, but I'm thinking. I've told Shelley several times, don't buy any more meat. Let's use all this up here first. And yet, who was on sale? Here we go. Got more meat. And I don't know how long I could go without meat. The problem is that probably the deep freeze would not have any power to it long before then. I'm going to have to eat it all in one day. And that doesn't work with the human body. I guess I could make some chicken jerky out on the metal roof or something like this. I'm not sure. And it's also the poor in the middle class who are going to bear the brunt of the inflation that comes about because of green new deals, green agendas, the taxation, the increased taxation that comes out. All of these are anti poor and anti middle class. Now. Even if we agreed with all the green new agenda. Wouldn't we want to say. We got to find a way to do this that is not harmful for the least of these my brethren. We. As Christians ought to at least say. There's got to be a way that we cannot harm the poor in the making of the shifting of our energy policies now. Because the agenda is going to make energy resources scarce. It will on it. It will be the rich and powerful who will benefit at the expense of the poor. Who will be able to afford the electric car and getting the electric car charge? Who is it that drives the I don't know. Still drives the Ford Pinto Collector. It's really the poor guy. He's the guy with the old beat up pick up truck and all that kind of stuff. And he's working. He's trying to keep it going, and he's changing the whatever on it. What happens to him when his government says, sorry, no gasoline. We don't do that. That's bad for the environment. Go eat some cake. Enjoy. Because you can't afford $80,000 electric vehicle and the plug in for your house and all that kind of stuff. But we don't care. We don't care. We're all about humanity, except the poor people. Not them, not those humanity. Let's put them in the gas chamber because we're going to need the food. It really does get ugly, and it gets ugly pretty quick. And I think that it doesn't take rocket science to kind of look ahead and see this all the while when we, who are Christians, ought to be saying, as we learned last night, wait, we've got an energized world. Surely we can figure out how to provide energy basically for everyone. If every single atom we have is electrical, well, why can't we figure out how to make plenty of electricity for all and plenty of power for all? I actually think we can. And we're going to close out today asking you youngsters to do it for us. Now with that, then, I think that what you have is an environmental agenda that really is anti human. It's a Mother Earth worshiping antiGod and really anti human. It's the snail darter that has to survive, not the human that has to survive. And it brings then this environmental agenda brings its own version of total depravity, or original sin. Original sin has one idea of the calvinist with it. I don't accept or adopt. I had a sermon on it, if you want to look that up. But the theology of the environmental agenda also has a doctrine of total depravity, and that is that mankind is so totally depraved that they are going to destroy the Earth. They are destroying the Earth. They have been destroying the Earth, and the Earth is our goddess, and the Earth is what we need to watch out for and what we need to care for. And so it is very much a theological movement and yet an antiGod theological movement. Now, let's talk about some of the things in the agenda here's one you may or may not have heard of. The environmental agenda wants to ban chlorine. Okay? I don't use it except in your drinking water. You have tap water at your house. What rich people. You got tap water. Do you produce any sewage, your tap water? For most, I'm fortunate that I have a water. Well, I don't use chlorine, but for most, it comes from some city source, municipal source, and they chlorinate it. They send it on to you. So that basically, as we talked last night, they oxidize it. They get rid of all the microbials that might be growing in there. They're going to make you sick. That's awfully nice of them to do. But the environmental agenda wants to ban chlorine because chlorine might spill along the way as you're transporting it to the water treatment plan. It might spill. And they're not saying send dirty water. Let's not chlorinate it. Send dirty water. They're saying purify the water in different ways. That's a great idea, except what are the different ways? They're more expensive. You got it. So what happens? We've done a great thing for humanity. We don't spill chlorine on the way to the water treatment plan or the sewage plan. We don't do that anymore. We now charge three times as much for water. But, man, nothing's going to spill. Who pays the price for that? Not us rich guys. It's the poor guys. I mean, we pay it too, but we're the ones that okay. So the water bill went from $70 a month to $120 a month. Remember when water bills were $5 a month? By the way? We can go up, pay the extra $10 that it comes to. No, we make it, we survive. We still have chicken in the bottom of the deep freeze, right? And it's all good. But there are so many people who really do live not even month to month. They live week to week. You look in the want ads and I don't know, I have a hobby of reading the employment ads. It's so fun. So I read them. You know what I see more and more today is we pay daily. Daily. At the end of the day, you get your paycheck. Now, why are they doing this? Because there are struggling poor people out there who really can't wait two weeks for their paycheck. Most of us can wait two weeks for our paycheck. It's going to be fine. There are people out there, they don't have a credit card. They don't even have a bank account. And so they need some sort of card that you can put it on that they can go use to go down to the city and pay their exorbitant water bill. We pay daily. And that is part of these things that, okay, let's eliminate chlorine. By the way, chlorine is on the periodic chart that we looked at last night. You can't eliminate chlorine. It's a natural substance, but you could say, okay, you can't transport chlorine. Anybody can have chlorine, but you just can't move it. You can create your own chlorine, by the way, using table salt and electricity and whatnot. And you can create it, but it's not very cheap. Those of you down in swimming pool country, a lot of people there would have saltwater pools, as they call them saltwater pools. It's not really saltwater that kills the microbes. It is the salt that goes through electrolysis that makes chlorine. You have chlorine in your pool. If you have a salt water pool, that's what it is. You just make it right there. And it costs a little more to make it right there. But then upfront cost. But if you got a swimming pool you can afford, pay a little more. Make your own chlorine right here. But again, the problem comes to the poor in more expensive water bills and sewer bills and paper. How did that paper get so white? Chlorine. You've never seen a tree that white, have you? So who uses paper? Anybody? Yeah, everybody but my son. He hates using paper. He believes that everything should be on the computer. You should never use paper, but that's because he's young. Household items and household cleansers, all those kind of stuff. The banning of the transport of chlorine would be huge on your personal budget, but it would be better for Mother Earth. So it's part of the agenda, banning fossil fuels. We're actually in the next session going to talk about fossil fuels but these really are, as I said here, these fuels are the only privately efficient fuel source. By that I mean they don't need government subsidies. There are other fuel sources, obviously, but government resources just for kicks. I decided I would find out what it would cost to put solar on my house. And so I got an estimate, which I think was somewhere around $50,000, but you all would pay 20,000 of that. I would end up only paying 30,000 of that because the government, the taxpayer is going to say, yeah, we'll subsidize because there's no way this is really going to work on an economic scale, but we want to get everybody off fossil fuels and so we'll subsidize. We'll pay for it. By the way, if I did that, and I'm not going to, unless you want to subsidize the other $30,000, too. But if I did that, then the government would be paying me to not use the electrical source that for us in house anyway, is 100% solar during the daytime. So, okay, I go from solar to solar, and the government would pay for it. This doesn't really make a whole lot of sense, does it? That doesn't matter if it makes a whole lot of sense because it's eco tyranny. And when you go through poor neighborhoods, we don't have any. But when you go through poor neighborhoods, how many solar panels do you see? Zero, because it's not economically feasible for anybody but the rich, the rich wouldn't do it if the government wasn't kicking in a good portion of the bill. Well, again, it's not science based. It's not efficient economically. And this is why for years and years to come, the poor guy is going to drive the old gasoline pickup, and he's going to have the gasoline mower, and he's going to have natural gas coming into his house to cook his food with and all that, because this is what is efficiently given. And so we're saying to the poor, we don't care if you're going to suffer, if you're going to have to walk, if you're going to have to go move into the cubicle somewhere, this is what we need anyway, from the time that from now until we can get you to die so that we'll have better things. Again, I say it a little more bluntly than the politicians do, but that is the agenda there. And the next one, how about this? Ban food products, especially meat. Anybody ready for the agenda yet? No more meat. Why no more meat? Because raising meat of any kind takes land and water and fertilizer, that's nitrogen, all that bad stuff in there, all of those things, land, water and chemicals all stir environmental angst. How in the world are we all going to have a hamburger if it takes all this land, all this water, all this nitrogen? And furthermore, those cows burp making all this methane gas. And we're trying to figure out how to put a gas mask on and something on the other end, too, to capture the methane. Maybe we can sell it to the poor. I don't know. The whole banning meat thing is part of it. And so people are going to eat something. The first substitute was plant based and that's still pretty popular. What do they call it? What's the name of that company? Almost meat or something. Beyond Meat. Beyond meat. That's what it is. Beyond me, yeah, you want to mess up your electrons, go for that stuff. But anyway, at first it was plant based, and there's still a lot of plant based in order to exchange from meat into plants that might be made to taste like meat. Now they're even beyond that to one of two things, and that is for the rich. You can have some synthetic meat. Chemically produced meat grown in a laboratory doesn't just make you hungry. By the way, pot luck. Tomorrow we will have no synthetic meat. I can promise that. But again with that, who pays the greatest price for it? The poor synthetic meat cost you more plant based products. They're going to cost you more. Maybe you can get the nutrition. I'll just say, okay, maybe you can get the nutrition. I don't really think so, but nonetheless, maybe you could get the nutrition. But it's going to cost you a lot more than that. The chicken and the egg that was out there, maybe for a poor person that lives out in the country, they got their chickens out there and their goat and their cow and their pig, and that's their meat and they're carrying all that out. Well, this is too bad. Eat tofu and it's anti poor and anti middle class. So they want to then create these artificial food products. I skipped over. If you can't afford the synthetic stuff, that's okay because there are bugs. Look it up. Go on the Internet and just type in eat bugs. And you will find old bugs are healthy and you learn to like them and they taste so good. And the one guy who says, someday we're all going to eat bugs and be happy, we got to quit using all that land, all that water, all that nitrogen, because this is Mother Earth that we're talking about. And so we will eat some synthetic meat while the rest of you eat bugs and be happy. Less privately owned land. There is such a movement to federalize land, and federalization of land usually ends up meaning there is no fuel sourcing of that land. All the fuels available on that land become untouchable. And what does that do again for the poor guy, for the household consumer who just needs a little natural gas in to warm up his bugs. Cost more. Now you can't use it now, you've got to use this now. On and on you get penalized because you didn't use solar and it's more and more and it basically gets where the poor man can't survive. This is the eco tyranny that you've got here. I think that if someone were to do the study it would be kind of an interesting one. I suspect that every expansion of federal lands over the last 20 years and there's been a lot of it all the expansion of federal lands over the last 20 years, I suspect you would find it is all in energy rich areas. All energy rich lands. This is what they want to get. This is the way of doing it. By the way, what does it take for land to become federally protected? You got it. Take the pen. The President can declare this is a national heritage site. They have this thing now called Treasured landscape. The President can declare that's treasured landscape. Treasured by who? Treasured for what? Basically what it means is less drilling, less energy production and in the American West anyway, and of course most of you are westerners. Here in the American West, the federal land ownership is already at about 50% in most western states. That's why anywhere from the rocky states onward, land is going to cost you maybe double, maybe triple, maybe quadruple what is going to cost in the Midwest and going that way because of the federal encroachment of land and what has taken place here. And by making land expensive by the government making land expensive, guess what they can do? They can force the poor. Who can afford the available land? The rich. You take our community here and we have an area in which private available land is very limited. We've got national forests on both sides. We've got Bureau of Land Management. We got wild and scenic Rivers land. You've got Native American Pueblo land. And all of that brings it down to we got three acres left. The Texans come and wonder why we don't have big parking lots. We don't have much available. And in addition to that, add the fact that of the land that is available for private use, how much of it has water? I don't know. If you get rid of 50% of it right there. And so you can go out west of here, can't you? And you can buy land really cheap, right? What is it for $300 an acre? Is that what you'd get Mesa land for? I don't know. Anybody know steep anyway? So who is forced to live there? The poor. If you want your own place, that's where you're going to have to go. And you're going to have to bring your jugs of water out and use them and all the things that go to work there because land just simply is not available. So it's the poor that suffer. And that's okay for the environmental agenda because their desire is to just say hey, poor, come into the town and live in a cubicle. This is what we need. You to do, because we can monitor you in your cubicle, we can watch you in your cubicle. We can give you all these requirements, and you use less fuel anyway. If you'll live in a cubicle, you won't need very much fuel. And that's good because we've made it too expensive for you to need. And so the poor lose their, shall we call it, the American dream. You got that little house with the picket fence out front. They're never going to be able to do that because of the environmental agenda. Fewer cars, no gasoline engines. Again, this forces the poor into no transportation. Okay, that's good. That's what we wanted. We wanted them on the blue bus. Anyway, there's no need for them to have their own car. We provide a car for them, and they will go, and we tell them they will go and go wherever we tell them they will go. We're in charge here. And that limits their job opportunities, that limits their learning opportunities, on and on that you can go. My whole point is we've got a world that is full of energy, and yet we've got policies that are saying, can't use any of that energy. Sorry, we got to bow down to Mother Earth, and it's survival of the fittest. So we're going to make it. We rich people can afford to live by these policies. But you poor people, there's a little cubicle over there for you to go in and hubble up and die eating your bugs. When you're done, we'll have more stuff. Survival of the fittest is their idea. Fewer cars. California, I think, recently said no gasoline engines. By what year was it, do you remember? 2035. That's not very long from now. That's what, 1215 years, something like that. 13 years. I think that policy has no gasoline automobile sold in California. After 20 years, I think you can still drive one, but obviously, what's that going to do to maintenance and upkeeping garages and the selling of gasoline and all that kind of stuff? And furthermore, in 13 years, can California be ready for everybody to go get an electric car? Well, absolutely they cannot be, but it doesn't matter because we got buses for them, those people that can't afford to get one. They have bicycles and buses, and their bus goes to two stops in town because this is where we put all those poor people that can't afford to live according to our wonderful policies for the Earth. And it really is a hate people kind of agenda. And yet in so many evangelical churches, I think it's given sort of as, oh, this is just wonderful, this is what ought to be done. This is a help, and it's social justice and it's environmental justice and all these kinds of things that go about. In the end, the real desire, the real agenda is fewer people. Again, if you look up, I don't know, population, what's the population some general term like that, you're going to find all sorts of articles about, we have too many people. The population growth has got to slow down. In fact, it's got to go backwards. We've got to have less people on this Earth and policies are enacted. You can look up this phrase if you want, which call for sustainable reduction in population. That means somebody is going to die. Sustainable reduction in population. Let's get rid of the people. The late Prince Philip. Remember him? He once said it's one of his most famous they might call it a gas, but I think it was I probably shouldn't have said that with the cameras on, but what he said was, when I die, if I'm reincarnated, I'd like to come back as a virus, a deadly virus, so that I can help out the world population. Problem kind of sick, isn't it? I want to come back and kill people because we got too many and there's no way I'm going to be able to relive my rich royal lifestyle. If all these poor people are out there, let's give them a virus. I'll come back and do it now. It really is sick and disgusting and hate to bring it so close to the Queen's death, but it is what it is, right? There was a reason for 1776, but nonetheless, it is what it is through there. And so here's how the tyranny is going to affect you. Number one, government policies will make our world's abundant energy unavailable for use. Again, the whole first session is, we've got energy all around us. And the concept of the environmental agenda is, yeah, we got energy all around us, but you can't use it. In fact, the environmental green agenda actually would deny that we have energy all around us. They don't understand this, they're not following the science, and so there's not enough energy, and so we're going to make it scarce so only we rich people can do it. These policies will create government overlords that will determine who gets energy, when they get energy and why they get energy. And so if you want Alexandria OCASIOCORTEZ is that her name? AOC? Yeah. Cortez if you want her deciding when you get to turn the heat on, go for the green agenda. I don't really want her to be able to decide that. Right. But it will create overlords. That's why it's tyranny. Then there will be tens of thousands of deaths during times when peak energy is needed but unavailable. I think you Texans could even give us stories about last year, last winter, when the storm of the century came in and froze everybody out, and the energy policies made it such that, sorry, we don't have heat for you for the next three days, coldest days in 100 years, we don't have heat for you. And I don't remember how many people died. Does anybody? A lot of people died and who were. They people, poor people that couldn't go they didn't have their nice wood stove that maybe they could burn books from Dispensational publishing to keep them warm, whatever it was, they didn't have all that. So the poor people that's who died, they had shandy little homes that weren't insulated as well as others, and they didn't have the generator that was out there in my neighborhood, in Katie. And it's still somewhat true up here where I live. The second the power goes off, the generator is kick in. Those poor people over there don't have lights. Now, sometimes it's because a freak storm comes in or something and it puts out the power. Obviously that happens. But the policies we are creating will create more of that, because at times when the energy is needed, it simply is not going to be there. We've created policies that say we don't provide that much. I don't know. I hear you, Californians. Is it true that they ask you not to use electricity at certain times and brown outs and things like that that go, fortunately, we don't have that here yet. And besides that, we don't have an air conditioner, so we don't have peak energy. But we open the window. But that's the issue, okay? Evil governments will capitalize on the need and use it for political purposes. There is evil in our world, and evil will watch. Let's just take the United States. Evil will watch what we do and say, they're making all these dumb policies that are going to put them at great risk. All we have to do is be ready the moment we find them cold, hungry, and dying and no way to power their vehicles, no way to get around that. We sweep in, we come in. I kind of think that Putin is doing a little bit of that today because Russia is a big provider of natural gas, right? And I don't think Putin's really all that interested in the Green agenda, any of that. He's going to produce his gas. But guess what? All of Europe has these policies that this winter, if they have a cold winter, they're going to have a real cold winter in their houses because they said, no, can't use any of that energy. Can't use it. Can't use it. And now Putin's going to come along and he's going to say, our prices just went up. We won't even sell it to you unless you'll bow down and kiss my Russian boot. Then you can have some of it. And these power players, evil power players in the world certainly will go and carry that out. And then eventually your need and my need, you and I might have enough backbound to die for it. But your need for energy will force you to submit to the energy overlords. I got to raise my kids. I got to get to work. And the got to will cause you to eventually submit and say, okay, guess that's just the way it's going to be. And I will submit to them until the enemy salutes in and takes over. So that session three that I just am concluding. Now there is a sense in which you might say, oh, that's way too political. And yet I think both parties kind of support the Green Agenda to some degree or another. Not really political at all. It's a policy issue that is based upon a rejection of scripture. A rejection of scripture that says, look, the world is going to keep working and it reveals to us that there is an abundant energy supply and we can figure it out and we can shift from one supply to another and we ought to be doing some research and development to find the best ways to provide. But the Green New Agenda is not about all of that. The Green New Agenda is about how can we control power and save the Earth under our flawed view of what the Earth is. It's built upon a flawed theology and it is going to come back and get each one of us if we let it go. And honestly, I see no hope out there politically that it's going to change. Who will be our next president? I don't know. But my guess is the Green Agenda will either go quickly in the next administration or it'll go slowly. But it'll go the forces out there are so powerful, the political forces and the monetary forces are so powerful that that's where it is. As you and I, we meet people all the time and come across people who might support the Green energy. And can we say as a Christian, as a Bible, believe in Christian? I kind of have a different view of the way the world works. And I think that this is a policy that's informed of Darwinianism and Mother Earth concepts more than biblical Christianity. We ought to come to the table as Biblical Christians and say let's provide an energy policy that really is going to work for our nation. And again, maybe that's a way that what if Christians live longer than everybody else, they're healthier than everybody else and they are able to come into the national dialogue and say here's a better plan, we need to take care of energy. We got to have energy. Here's the best plan to take care of this in a way that is how many of you want to breathe carbon dioxide or carbon monoxide all the time? You want clean air, right? You want clean air. You want clean rivers. You want clean streams. How do we do this? We can do this and we know it's possible. And with that I'm out of time for session three. The energy is the focus today. When we come back into session four, we are going to talk about fossil fuels and what they are sort of get our understanding on this electrical world that we live in and how fossil fuels play a part in all of that. Let me lead this in the word of prayer. Dear Heavenly Father, I pray that this morning, if nothing else, I have spurred some thinking and some soul searching and some imagination in those of us who do believe in the promise of Genesis eight, verse 22. And it's my prayer that we as Christians even, would be able to come to the table with some policies that would be pro people and people who are made in the image of God. People who are going to suffer from the policies that are being put forth and have been put forth really for the last 20 or 30 years. And pray that you would give us Christian thinkers and biblical thinkers for this purpose. In Jesus name, amen. Let's take a little break. Will take about 15 minutes or so, those views. You online. It'll be a new broadcast here in just a moment to go get some snacks and bathroom. Whatever you need. God bless.